Resources
General
EPR Paradox and Bell's Theorem
- Albert Einstein, Boris Bodolsky, and Nathan
Risen, Can
Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered
Complete? Physical Review 47, 777, 1935. The original
EPR paper.
- Neils
Bohr, Can
Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered
Complete? Physical Review 48, 696, 1935. Bohr's response
to the EPR paper.
- Arthur Fine, The
Einein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument in Quantum Theory, The
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2013 Edition, Edward
N. Zalta (ed.). A detailed and quite readable account of the EPR
argument and responses to it.
- Kurt Jacobs and Howard
Wiseman, An
Engangled Web of Crime: Bell's Theorem as a Short Story.
American Journal of Physics 73, 932. 2005.
The Copenhagen Interpretation
Einstein
- A
Pais, Einstein
and the quantum theory, Reviews of Modern Physics, 51,
864. 1979. A review of Einstein's contributions to quantum theory,
philosophical and
otherwise. [pdf]